Home
Login / Create an Account

Main Menu

  • Talking Points
    • GLBT Civil Rights Summary
    • Fallacies of Logic and Rhetoric
    • NOM-specific Marriage Equality Talking Points
    • Fundie to English Dictionary
    • "Turnspeak"
  • Blogs
  • GAYNEWSSERVICE.com
  • Submit Blog
    • Editorial & Article Submission Policy
  • NewsVac
    • Mainstream and Progressive News
    • News From Right Leaning Media
  • Homophobes
    • Bigots
    • Hate Organizations
  • Beale Award
  • Privacy

Follow us on TwitterTips-Q Mobile Site

  • Home
  • Contact
  • Create Bio
  • Find Articles by Source
  • -RSS Feeds

Latest:

  • Blogs
  • NewsLeft
  • Right
  • Gay Musical for Thanksgiving - Oh The Horror!
  • NY Times on NJ Marriage Equality
  • C Street "Family" Linked to Ugandan Oppression of Gays
  • The "War on Thanksgiving?"
  • Archbishop Wuerl Continues His Shakedown [Video]
  • Liberty Counsel Can Kiss My Ass
  • South Korea bar district offers a safe haven for gay servicemembers
  • Lesbian sgt. discharged after police tell military
  • Lesbian blames cops for military discharge
  • Gay Air Force Sgt. Dismissed After Police Tell Military Of Marriage License
  • Lesbian Air Force sergeant discharged after police tell military
  • Lesbian sgt. discharged after police tell military
  • Zig Zag Zapf Blames James Hartline For HER Flip Flop-O-Rama on Homosexuality
  • NBC's Golden Girl, Kathy Griffin: 'I'd Like to Push Sarah Palin Down the Stairs'
  • Census Bureau Flip-Flops on Defense Of Marriage Act; Says They Will Count Self-Identified Homosexual Couples as 'Married'
  • Tea Party Stays Away From Key Social Issues
  • Mike Corthell : God's definition of 'family'
  • Quinlan Appeals to Disney Board of Directors for ‘Ex-Gay’ Diversity Training

See an abusive comment?

Before you flag a comment, please consider just replying instead.

The Boiled Frog Blog

Boil a frog slowly and it fails to appreciate its own peril.

Subscribe to Comments

Comment RSS

Stand For Marriage Maine Cannot Come up With $25K?

Submitted by David Hart on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 14:23

MoneybagCombine the victim du jour with a desperate plea for "just $25,000 more in the next 48 hours" and that summarizes today's Stand for Marriage Maine email blast. Given the profligate spending of SFFM, $25,000 seems immaterial; a sum that National Organization for Marriage  or the Portland Diocese could fork over with a salad fork. Come to think of it, neither Marc nor Maggie look like they eat many salads but I digress. My guess is that the last minute plea for the small sum is deliberately understated to encourage smaller donors who might feel that their 50 bucks is more consequential to the total requested.

The sad thing is that all these hard working folks have been conned into believing that marriage equality somehow affects them. In point of fact, marriage equality only has a direct effect on the gay couples who choose to wed and their children. Indirectly, gay marriage affects the diocese. Bishop Malone sees marriage equality as an official affirmation that homosexuality is acceptable. For their part, the National Organization for Marriage is just a business — a political consultancy incorporated as a not-for-profit organization. NOM's clients are right wing fundamentalist religious organizations. These include Opus Dei (with which NOM has a direct connection) and the various groups that make up the theocrtatic Dominionism movement across the United States.

The victim du jour is Don Mendell. I wrote about Mendell on Friday. Mr. Mendell is the school guidance counselor who has appeared in a Stand for Marriage Maine TV commercial and who wrote an inflammatory anti-gay letter to the Bangor Daily News. Therein, he indulged in the offensive meme that sexual orientation is really just a "behavior." He also put air to the dog whistle that gays are out to recruit and indoctrinate children. Some non-discerning readers process this as "gays are out to make my kid gay" or "queers molest children." The full inference is predicated upon the degrees of incuriousness and ignorance. It is the same tactic that has been used (often effectively) since the days of Anita Bryant and the contest in California over the Briggs Initiative (the 1978 enterprise that would have banned gays and lesbians, and possibly anyone who supported gay rights, from working in California's public schools).

Mendell's views are at odds with his own professional organization, the American Counseling Association, as well as every other professional education organization. Mendell chooses to work in the public school system. His obvious and admitted homophobia does call into question his ability to be a guidance counselor. He does a disservice to straight kids. In the real world, they are going to have gay co-workers, bosses, subordinates, vendors and suppliers. If, through religious indoctrination, they become wed to the notion that homosexuality is a "behavior,"  then they are unprepared for what awaits them in college or the workplace. The notion that Mendell counsels gay kids (who he seems to consider perverts) is a very discomforting thought.

By the way, Mendell is already being represented by the Alliance Defense Fund. ADF turns victims into professional Christian victims. ADF is always on the troll for their next idiot who will profess that Christians are an oppressed minority. Undoubtedly, Mendell with appear in the next version of A Gathering Storm. He is probably having lunch with the Wirthlins next week.

To tie Mendell to the anti-marriage equality campaign, Mutty makes a tenuous connection:

We learned just yesterday that the person who filed the complaint against Mr. Mendell works for a school principal who happens to be the husband of the gay activist teacher who appeared in a No on Question 1 commercial!

The next step is to tie this to the homosexual agendaTM:

If this sort of thing can happen before homosexual marriage is even legalized, can you imagine what will happen once they have the law on their side? The message is unmistakable: It's fine to speak out if you support gay marriage, but if you speak out against it, they will punish you. It's just the latest example that if Question 1 fails and homosexual marriage is legalized, those in power in Maine schools will push it on students just as they are trying to punish one of Maine's best educators for supporting traditional marriage.

This, of course is hyperbolic, illogical and senseless noise. This has nothing to do with marriage. It is a consequence of Mendell's intolerant views of gay people.

This is all woven together to form an appeal for funds:

It is outrageous what is happening to Don Mendell. Voters need to hear about it, but we are out of money. We need to raise $25,000 right away so that we can buy more air time and inform voters about what is going on.

Ultimately, what this boils down to is; Gimme money so that we can make voters aware of a complaint filed against Mendell by a subordinate of someone who is married to a No On 1 supporter because Mendell has expressed views that are unprofessional and homophobic. This all probably makes perfect sense to Mutty. What a shock.

Dear Question 1 Supporter,

We are so grateful for all your support, but I need to ask you one last time to please step up with a financial contribution so we can educate voters about a fast-breaking development that could be important to voters as they head to the polls on Tuesday. Here's the situation:

The latest example of how those in power in Maine schools will push homosexual marriage on students involves Don Mendell, a public school counselor who appeared in a Yes on Question 1 television ad. Mr. Mendell is a two-time recipient of the state Department of Education Commissioner's Recognition Award and was nominated as Maine State Teacher of the Year. Despite a lifetime of service, a formal complaint was filed with the state seeking to have his license revoked. They say because Mr. Mendell spoke out in support of Question 1 he should not be allowed to counsel students anymore.

We learned just Friday that the person who filed the complaint against Mr. Mendell works for a school principal who happens to be the husband of the gay activist teacher who appeared in a No on Question 1 commercial!

If this sort of thing can happen before homosexual marriage is even legalized, can you imagine what will happen once they have the law on their side? The message is unmistakable: It's fine to speak out if you support gay marriage, but if you speak out against it, they will punish you. It's just the latest example that if Question 1 fails and homosexual marriage is legalized, those in power in Maine schools will push it on students just as they are trying to punish one of Maine's best educators for supporting traditional marriage.

It is outrageous what is happening to Don Mendell. Voters need to hear about it, but we are out of money. We need to raise $25,000 right away so that we can buy more air time and inform voters about what is going on.

Will you please help us one more time?

Our polling shows the race to be very tight and there is evidence that undecided voters are starting to move our way. However, Question 1 could go either way depending on who actually votes. We've emptied our bank account to fund our get-out-the-vote campaign and pay for our advertising. If we can raise just $25,000 more in the next 48 hours, we can help make sure those remaining undecided voters hear about what is happening to this courageous school counselor who supports Question 1.

I know you have already sacrificed to help us, but please make a last-minute contribution right now so that we can make sure that every undecided voter knows about the latest consequence if Question 1 were to fail.

Thank you for everything you have done. Please don't forget to vote Yes on Question 1 on Tuesday and call all your friends to do so as well. And if you have not signed up to be an Election Day volunteer, there is still time to do so! Please email doug@standformarriagemaine.com to sign up!

Marc Mutty
Campaign Chairman

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Newsvine
  • Technorati
Email this page

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Tips-Q.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Tips-Q
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Tips-Q web site.
  • David Hart's blog
  • Post to Twitter

Submitted by Jason in Pittsfield (not verified) on Mon, 11/02/2009 - 22:30.

"Since the Bishop has just given Pamella Belliveau the ax for writing an editorial in support of No on 1."

 

To me that would be an honor. My whole extended family, 43 people, have with one exception left the Catholic church since Benedict took over.

And our contributions to the No on1 have been substantial.  As much as I and my wife have given to the church over the last 10 years.

And most of us are now members of more progressive churches who support what Jesus said about tthe only two real commandments :

Love God

And Love thy neighbor as thyself.  Which does not include denigration, denial of their humanity, spreading the greatest lie - that being gay is a choice.

To Paraphrase Doctor Martin Luther King,  Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last of the Catholic church.   And it was so easy to do.  We are still awaiting our excommunication - a letter we will enlarge, and put under glass in a large permanent lawn sign.

We aren't afraid of the church, and its bigotted bishop any more.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by Steve in Bangor (not verified) on Mon, 11/02/2009 - 22:22.

It is amazing at all the hyperbole and wild claims that come from the people most opposed to giving gay people equal rights under the law.

 

It reminds me of the exact same mentality from the days when black people were segregated, the greatest crime was to have sex between a black man and a white woman, which often resulted in murders.  And it took the courts till 1968 to overide the biblical based corruption that denied mixed race marriages in most states.

 

Gay people are entitled to the same legal rights as str8 people, including civil marriage rights under the law.

And those who really use God to denigrate part of His creation - our gay citizens - will suffer for their crimes for eternity.  The only shame is that they are not suffering here.

For their lies and hatreds in the Name of God.  In maine, promulgated by the Catholic church.  The same people who gave the world the hatred of Jesus own people, the Jews.  Which hitler leveraged that hatred to gain control of germany.   You know what that led to.

The question is not whether gays should get marriage rights.  The question is whether all of us should leave the Catholic church, or close our pocketbooks to it for all time.

And if enough of us do that, they will suddenly change.  Proving that Money is the root of all evil.

It is not just Islam that is a problem to the world, but also ultra-conservative christianity.  Islam lives in the 10th century, the catholic church still lives in some ways in the 15th century.  Except instead of burning people at the stake as witches, they simply deny them equality under the law.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by Leslie on Mon, 11/02/2009 - 11:01.

It is ironic that Marc Mutty writes this:

The message is unmistakable: It's fine to speak out if you support gay marriage, but if you speak out against it, they will punish you.

Since the Bishop has just given Pamella Belliveau the ax for writing an editorial in support of No on 1.

http://www.sunjournal.com/node/428730

L


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by John Howard (not verified) on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 18:06.

Elderly newlyweds have a right to try to procreate.  Same-sex couples should not have a right to try to procreate.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by John Howard (not verified) on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 16:57.

Not directly related to this post on Mendell or Mutty, but I'd like to leave a comment here if I may explaining why we should not give marriage rights to same-sex couples.

Same-sex marriage would mean either allowing radical procreation technology to enable same-sex couples to have biologically related children together, from their own genes, or it would strip away the right of every married man and woman to have bioloigcally related children together, with their own genes.

We simply cannot pretend that same-sex couples have equal rights as a man and a woman to procreate together.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by Binka (not verified) on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 19:48.

Same-sex marriage would mean either allowing radical procreation technology to enable same-sex couples to have biologically related children together, from their own genes, or it would strip away the right of every married man and woman to have bioloigcally related children together, with their own genes.

 

What are you smoking?   How is any opposite sex couple denied the "right" to have children together just because John and Joe get married?  Legalized same-sex marriage won't prevent Bill and Jane from having sex and spawning a litter.  

 

And what sort of "radical technology" is required for a same-sex couple to procreate?  Haven't you heard of a turkey baster or adoption?   Where do you get the idiotic idea that children "must" be biologically related to both members of a couple?   There are hundreds of thousands of children in orphanages and foster care who would love to have adoptive parents.  Why leave them in the system just to satisfy your sick bigotry?


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by John Howard on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 23:08.

The radical technology I'm talking about would be something like stem cell derived artificial eggs and sperm, like what was just announced at Stanford University last week:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1223617/No-men-OR-women-needed-artificial-sperm-eggs-created-time.html

If we allow labs to try to make biological offspring for same-sex couples, we will open the door to genetic modification, because same-sex procreation requires genetically modifying the imprinting to get them to be complementary.

We should not allow same-sex couples to attempt to make biologically related children together, as you point out there are so many other ways for same-sex couples to start families, and it is very insulting to kids in orphanages to insist on the right of same-sex couples to create biologically related kids together.

If we do prohibit genetic modification and prevent same-sex couples from using their own genes to procreate, then same-sex marriage would strip procreation rights from marriage - all marriages.  All marriages would no longer have the right to procreate with their own genes (they would probably still get away with doing it for a long time, but they wouldn't have the right to be doing it, their marriage would no longer protect their right and they'd have equal rights that a same-sex couple had.  That would make them vulnerable to genetic screening and eugenic pressures.  Marriage must continue to protect the couple's right to use their own genes, in order to protect everyone's equal rights and equality itself.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by Binka (not verified) on Mon, 11/02/2009 - 02:37.

1.  The Daily Mail is a junk tabloid.   You can't cite it and expect to be taken seriously.

2.  The technology you cite has nothing to do with same-sex marriage.  Parthogenesis, test-tube babies and other asexual reproductive advances will occur through science regardless of whether or not we legalize same-sex marriage.  Your claim that we need to prohibit same-sex marriage to prevent these things is false and absurd on its face.

3.  Your notion that people will lose their "right" to procreate with their own genes, as I previously stated, is insane.   Stop making up lunatic nonsense in your attempt to justify your anti-gay bigotry. 


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by John Howard on Mon, 11/02/2009 - 03:50.

1) They reported on it, which is to their credit.  The US media is not reporting on any of this research.  The research was done at Stanford and published in Nature, pay some money and you can <a href=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature08562.html>read it yourself here</a>.

2) Correct, but I'm not claiming we need to prohibit SSM to stop same-sex procreation.  I'm claiming that we need to stop same-sex procreation, and once we do that, we cannot have same-sex marriage, because that would strip procreation rights from marriage for everyone.

3) If marriage stops protecting the couple's right to procreate together using their own genes, then what protects a couples right to procreate using their own genes?  If a same-sex couple can be prohibited from procreating together, and they have "equal rights" to a married man and woman, then a married man and woman can be prohibited also.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Submitted by Robert of Montclair (not verified) on Sun, 11/01/2009 - 18:00.

That's a joke, right? Otherwise, we would have to figour out how to make elderly newlyweds procreate.


  • reply
  • flag-as-abusive

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p> <span> <blockquote> <br> <h2> <h3> <h4>
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p> <span> <blockquote> <br> <h2> <h3> <h4>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is to ensure you are human
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Subscribe to Comments

Comment RSS

Home -- About GayNewsService.com -- My Account -- Contact -- Create Bio -- RSS Feeds -- GLBT Civil Rights Summary -- Fallacies of Logic & Rhetoric -- Fundie to English Dictionary -- Turnspeak -- Submit Blog -- Blog Moderation Guidelines -- Mainstream and Progressive News -- News from the Self-Righteous Right -- Bigots -- Hate Organizations -- The Beale Award -- Privacy -- The News System -- Find Articles by Source

RoopleTheme